19
wholly untrue, and therefore the book story to be untrue, the bulk of which story had with an unimportant modification been admitted by the Governor here Johnson
Alber:
on the 25th
of
(14) after this Dr Eitel could not plead justification without compromising the Governor, whose retraction of the material charge made it possible for him to deny the truth of statements which he had made on the
after?
to deny Governor's authority, N... Note that the guarded language of denial in one of Dr Eitel's two letters of the 28th of November.
(15) that up to the date of the hot truce compromise he acted under the Governor's instructions throughout. (16) that the compromise included a letter from the Governor to Mr Hayllar (which we have not got) and telegram from the Governor to the S. of S. (supposed that of the 25th of November) see pap & CL besides 87 Eitel's letter on which alone it ostensibly rests
my rede
of the m para
20
bkan kaja kaksi naizzCAz
28. In brief Dr Eitel's defence amounts to this
that he was
12
that
Hu
not only authorised, but ordered, to shew the papers to Mr Johnson and to explain them to him his explanations were those of Governor himself, subject to a possible inaccuracy of no material importance statements in good faith, believing them to be true and that it was his duty to the Governor to make
that the Governor at first
Theer
that he made the
approved of what he had done but afterwards retracted the most material statement, which left Dr Eitel no alternative than to admit that the statements were untrue
29
Dr Eitel's very circumstantial defence requires to be circumstantially met, very bad te Governor meets it only in a general way. He cannot notice all Dr Eitel's
Dr
Eitel was only
inaccuracies to shew the papers and was to refer enquirers to the Governor for details. His statements were unauthorised
Page 19
...
Page 20
19
wholly untone, and therefore
the book story to be untone, the buth of which story had with an unimportant modification
been admitted by the Governor her Johnson
Altber:
on the 25the
of
(14) after thei Dr Eitel could not plead pistification withoul compromising the Governor, whose rehactation of the material charge made it posible porkin
the wouth of statemeals which he had made on the
afterm?
to deny
Sovernor's authority, N... Note
that the guarded language of denial in one of De Extel's two
Wellers of the 28
th of November.
(15) that up to the date of the
hot tonit
compromise he acted under the Governor's Mstructions throughout. (16) that the compromise included a letter from the Governor to Mr Hayllen (which we have not got) and Celegram from the Governor to the S. ofS. (suppose that of the 25th of November) see pap &
CL
besides 87 Eitels letter on wheels alone. it ostensibly rests?
myr de
of the m para
20.
bkan kaja kaksi naizzCAz
28. In brief Dr Eiters defence
accounts to this
that he was
12
thal
Hu
not only authoused, but ordered, to shew the papers to Mr Johnson and to explain them to tenn his explanations were those of Governor himself, subject to a posible maccuracy of no material importame statements in good faith, believing them to be true and that it was his duty to the Governor to make
that the Governor at first.
Theer
that he made the
approved of what he had done but afterwards nebacted the most material statement, which left on Eitel no alternative than to admit
that the statements were untrue
29
Dr Eitele
very
circumstantial
defence regenvies to be
circumstantially met,
very bat te
Governor meets it only in a general
way. He cannot notice all Dr Eitel's
Dr
Eitel was only
maccuracies
to shew the papers and was to refer enquirers to the Governor for details. His statements were unauthonied
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.